Prensa obreira

A.I.T

Distribuir contido
Actualizado: hace 1 hora 55 min

Errores de concepto sobre la Conferencia de Escisión

25 Setembro, 2016 - 20:39

Ha llegado a nuestra atención el hecho de que varias organizaciones han sido invitadas a una conferencia que trata ostensiblemente sobre “refundar la AIT” y que se celebrará en noviembre en España. Debido a que ello ha causado cierta confusión en cuanto a la naturaleza de la mencionada conferencia y para evitar cualesquiera malentendidos, nos gustaría clarificar unos cuantos temas.

El Congreso de la Asociación Internacional de los Trabajadores se celebrará a principios de diciembre en Polonia. Este Congreso y únicamente este Congreso es el lugar en el que se pueden tomar acuerdos relativos a las propuestas presentadas a la Asociación por parte de la totalidad de sus Secciones miembro.

La Conferencia que tendrá lugar en España, a la que han sido invitadas algunas organizaciones, no está organizada por la AIT aunque afirma ser una “conferencia para la preparación de la refundación de la AIT”. Es iniciativa es, por tanto, una escisión en la que se está invitando a organizaciones de fuera a decidir sobre el futuro de una federación a la que no pertenecen. Se celebra en contra de los estatutos, acuerdos y principios de la propia federación que afirma estar refundando y su propósito es excluir del proceso a una docena de otras Secciones miembro.

Nos referimos a estos hechos ya que ha llegado a nuestra atención que algunos compañeros de todo el mundo pueden no haber sido informados de la naturaleza de la conferencia y crean que se trata simplemente de un evento de “solidaridad”. No obstante, la invitación enviada a estas organizaciones señala claramente que cual es su propósito en su título. Por tanto, aquellos que no son miembros de la Federación de la AIT, considerando realmente los principios básicos, pueden llegar preguntarse cómo es posible que alguien proponga dejar fuera a los Miembros y dar voz a los no miembros.

La razón para llevar a cabo esta conferencia paralela antes de la legítima es involucrar a organizaciones de fuera en la formación del conflicto interno. En vez de presentarse ante los miembros. Tal maniobra es para dar la apariencia de que organizaciones de fuera están tomando partido en un conflicto interno y colocarlas en uno de los lados de la escisión. Así es como se tratará la asistencia de organizaciones de fuera, sea o no la intención de éstas.

Con esta aclaración, esperamos informar a los miembros de base de varias organizaciones, que pueden no haber visto la invitación o no ser conscientes de las circunstancias. La AIT se reúne en diciembre y es en el Congreso donde las Secciones miembro deben discutir y tomar acuerdos sobre el futuro de la organización, no una reunión no estatutaria a la que se convoca a organizaciones de fuera para que interfieran y apoyen a la facción secesionista. Como hemos señalado anteriormente, hace falta tiempo para trabajar las cosas en concordancia con los procedimientos de nuestra federación y agradeceríamos que las organizaciones de fuera se abstuvieran de involucrarse en estos asuntos que nos afectan directamente y han de ser resueltos por nosotros mismos.

Hacemos hincapié en que de ninguna manera queremos decir que cualesquiera organizaciones eviten ya sea a la AIT o la facción secesionista en asuntos tales como la solidaridad internacional, que debe continuar a pesar de estos tiempos difíciles. Es posible que no se alcance ninguna resolución de inmediato y que pueda existir un conflicto a más largo plazo, en el caso de que la facción secesionista continúe insistiendo en actuar en nombre de la federación que ya existe. La AIT ha intentado no involucrar a otras organizaciones en estos asuntos internos y no pedirles que tomen partido en la escisión. La facción secesionista, no obstante, ha decidido hacer justamente eso. Pedimos a la gente que tenga cuidado con tales circunstancias para que la situación no tenga más repercusiones negativas.

Secretariado de la AIT

Idioma:  Tipo de contenido: 
Categorías: A.I.T.

Misconceptions over Split Conference

24 Setembro, 2016 - 14:08

lt has come to our attention that various organizations have been invited to a conference ostensibly about „rebuilding the IWA” that is to be held in November in Spain. Due to the fact that this has caused some confusion as to the nature of said conference and to avoid any misunderstandings, we would like to clarify a few matters.

The Congress of the lnternational Workers' Association is to be held at the beginning of December in Poland. This Congress and only this Congress is where decisions about the proposals submitted to the Association can be made by the entirety of its member Sections.

The conference being held in Spain, to which some organizations were invited, is not organized by the IWA, although it claims to be a „conference for the preparation of the IWA refoundation”. This initiative is thus a split where outside organizations are being invited to decide over the future of a federation to which they do not belong. It is held against the statutes, agreements and principles of the very federation it claims to be refounding and its aim is to exclude a dozen other member Sections from the process.

We refer to these facts since it has come to our attention that some comrades around the world may not have been informed to the nature of the conference and believe this is just an international „solidarity” event. However, the invitation sent to these organizations clearly state what the purpose is in the title. Therefore, those who are not members of the IWA Federation must really consider basic principles and ask how it is possible that anybody proposes to cut out the Members and give a voice to non-members.

The reason for holding this parallel conference before the legitimate one is to involve outside organizations in shaping the internal conflict. Instead of coming before the membership. Such a maneouvre is to make it look as if outside organizations are taking sides in an internal conflict and to place them on one side of a split. This is how the attendance of outside organizations will be treated, whether or not that was their intention.

With this clarification, we hope to inform the rank and file members of various organizations, who may not have seen the invitation or be aware of the circumstances. The IWA meets in December and it is at the Congress that the Member Sections must discuss and make decisions about the future of the federation, not any non-statutory meeting to which outside organizations are called to interfere and support the split faction. As stated before, time is needed to work things out in accordance with the procedures of our federation and we would appreciate it if outside organizations refrain from involvement in these matters which concern us directly and need to be resolved by ourselves.

We stress that in no way do we imply that any organizations avoid either the IWA or the split faction in matters such as international solidarity, which must continue even through this difficult time. It is possible that no resolution will be reached right away and that a longer conflict may exist, should the split faction continue to insist on acting in the name of the existing federation. The IWA has tried not to involve other organizations in these internal matters or ask them to take sides in the split. The split faction however has decided to do just that. We ask that people be cautious about such circumstances so that the situation not have new negative repercussions.

IWA Secretariat

Idioma:  Tipo de contenido: 
Categorías: A.I.T.

The legal repression continues in Serbia

8 Agosto, 2016 - 12:46

The case against a group of people accused of having attacked the Greek Embassy in Belgrade has gone on for 7 years already. On July 25, a new chapter in this grotesque process opened when judge Goran Ramic presented a new sentence, convicting four of the defendents and acquitting one. Ratibor Trivunac was sentences to an 8 month suspended sentence for 3 years, Ivan Vulovic, Sanja Dojkic and Ivan Savic were condemned to six months suspended for 2 years. Tadej was aquitted. This is not the end of the case, since we will appeal this farse until the end, until all the "Belgrade Six" are completely cleared of all the charges.

We remind people that on September 3, 2009, six people (four of which are members of ASI) were detained on the suspicion that on August 25, 2009, at 3AM, they painted a circle A – a symbol of the anarchist movement - and threw 2 „Molotov cocktails” at the Greek Embassy. The six were detained during the night and were kept in custody for 6 months. The then Prosecutor, Slobodan Radovanovic, personally intervened to ask that charges be added of " international terrorism". The Prosecutor tried to implicate all of ASI with the intention of declaring it a "terrorist organization" in the frame-up of the "Belgrade Six". Thanks to strong international pressure, acts of public support and the echo of the case in the media, they decreased efforts to implicate ASI. The Tribunal decided to release the anarchists during the first trial in February 2010 and on June 16, 2010, the Supreme Tribunal judge Dragoljub Gerasimović asked decided that the accused should be aquitted of all the charges. But this was not the end, but the beginning of a political trial that is soon entering its 8th year.

In April 2011, ASI launched a campaign against NATO and in response they would organize an event planned from 13-15 of June. The first protest was scheduled in from of Sava Center in Belgrade. This peaceful protest was surrounded by police, they were insulted and plain clothes police brutally detained 8 people, 3 of which were members of ASI. Immediately after prohibiting the protests, members of ASI were harrassed and detained. This media lynch included calls for the Appeal Court to overturn the acquittal of the Belgrade Six. It is not surprising that less than two weeks later, the Appeal Tribunal accepted the appeal of the Prosecutor to overturn the acquitaal and return the case to the lower court for a new trial.

The political circumstances that accompanied the process continue in 2015. We will not be intimidated or remain passive. We will continue to participate in social struggles and advocating the creation of a combative union movement of mutual aid and direct action to fight against the State and Capitalism.

ASI Secretariat
(translation shortened from the original text)

Idioma:  Tipo de contenido: 
Categorías: A.I.T.

Continúa la persecución judicial de los anarquistas en Serbia

7 Agosto, 2016 - 22:17

Desde hace siete años, sigue el montaje contra un grupo de jóvenes acusados ​​de haber atacado la embajada griega en Belgrado. El pasado, 25 de julio a las 11:00 horas, se abrió un nuevo capítulo de este proceso grotesco cuando el juez de la Corte en Belgrado Goran Ramic presenta de nuevo la sentencia de primera instancia, por la cual, los cuatro acusados que ​​fueron condenados y uno fue absuelto. Ratibor Trivunac fue condenado a ocho meses de prisión suspendido por tres años; Ivan Vulovic, Sanja Dojkic e Ivan Savic fueron condenados a seis meses de prisión con suspensión de dos años; Tadej fue absuelto. Esto no es de ninguna manera el final del proceso, porque estamos decididos a revocar esta farsa judicial hasta el final, hasta que todos los acusados ​​en el juicio " Los Seis de Belgrado" no hayan sido completamente absueltos de todos los cargos. El veredicto será sin duda, objeto de recurso, y esperamos que lo único razonable para los tribunales superiores sea que este veredicto quede alterado de manera liberadora y absolutoria.

Recordemos, el 3 de septiembre de 2009, seis jóvenes (de los cuales cuatro,  miembros de ASI) fueron detenidos por sospecha de que el 25 de agosto de 2009, alrededor de las tres de la madrugada, pintaron en la fachada la letra "A" rodeada de un círculo - un símbolo del movimiento anarquista -y tras esto lanzaron dos "cócteles molotov" en la sede de la Embajada de Grecia.  Los seis fueron detenidos durante la noche, y estuvieron bajo custodia, que se mantendrá durante los próximos seis meses, debido a que durante la noche el entonces fiscal, Slobodan Radovanovic, intervino personalmente para pedir el enjuiciamiento recalificando el delito de "causar peligro general" a "terrorismo internacional".  La Fiscalía trató de implicar a la totalidad de la ASI con la intención de declararla como una "organización terrorista" en el montaje del caso de "Los Seis de Belgrado". Gracias a la fuerte presión internacional, actos de apoyo públicos y el eco del caso en los medios de comunicación, en el primer proceso, se redujo el intento de implicar en el montaje a la ASI, tras la primera audiencia en febrero de 2010. El Tribunal decidió poner a los anarquistas de Belgrado en libertad para su defensa  y el 16 de junio de 2010, el juez del Tribunal Supremo de Belgrado Dragoljub Gerasimović pidió que todos los acusados ​​fuesenn absueltos de todos los cargos. Pero este no era el fin, sino el comienzo de un juicio político que pronto va a entrar en el octavo año. De hecho, en abril de 2011, Iniciativa Anarcosindicalista lanza una campaña anti-OTAN en respuesta a que en Belgrado del 13 al 15 de junio se realizará el evento más importante de esta organización en su historia hasta el momento. El primer acto de protesta previsto en contra de la reunión de la OTAN se llevó a cabo el 12 de junio frente al "Sava Center" en Belgrado. Esta protesta pacífica de un centenar de personas fué rodeada la policía, siendo los manifestantes insultados y arrojados por una pendiente a través del Sava Center, y policías de civil no identificados detuvieron brutalmente a ocho participantes, de los cuales tres eran miembros de ASI. Inmediatamente después de prohibir las protestas empiezan las detenciones de miembros y campaña de acoso y derribo de la ASI. Este linchamiento mediático, incluye llamadas a la Corte de Apelación para revocar la absolución de los Seis de Belgrado. No es sorprendente que, a menos de dos semanas después de que el Tribunal de Apelación de Belgrado haya aceptado la apelación de la Fiscalía Superior revoque la absolución y devuelva el caso al tribunal de primera instancia para un nuevo juicio. Sólo unos días después, la Corte Superior en Belgrado (y los jueces Dragomir y Gerasimović, que trajeron la absolución), en un tono que no es competente para llevar a cabo el juicio contra los seis, y se decide que el caso se entregará al Juzgado de Primaria en Belgrado.

Las circunstancias políticas que han acompañado el proceso continúa en el 2015. El Presidente de la Corte Primera de Belgrado Tanja Sobat, a principios de noviembre y sin ningún criterio establecido adoptará una decisión sobre la transferencia de ocho jueces penales en el litigio y el departamento ejecutivo de la corte, lo que es igual que no son competentes. Uno de los jueces penales que fueron afectados por esta decisión fue Goran Ramic. Era en ese momento, en la vista de la causa "Embajada de Grecia", celebrada en noviembre de 2015 donde los abogados de los acusados fueron presionados si deseaban mantener sus puestos de trabajo, lo cual es muestra de otro factor de presión política por las que se guía este caso. Ramic más tarde, fue devuelto de nuevo a la Sala de lo Penal de la Corte. A lo largo del juicio no se ha establecido ninguna prueba que podría proporcionar un argumento legal para una condena. El veredicto hoy por hoy, es considerado como la continuación de terrorismo judicial que comenzó en 2009, cuando "Los Seis de Belgrado" pasaron la mitad de un año en la infernal prisión central de  Belgrado por cargos de terrorismo internacional, que sigue tras siete años, que ha pasado por el  cambio de cinco jueces, que ha visto modificado el auto de procesamiento, y que sufre la demonización mediática de la peor clase. Nosotros ni seremos intimidados ni permaneceremos pasivos. Vamos a seguir participando en las luchas sociales, abogando por la creación de un movimiento sindical combativo de apoyo mutuo y de acción directa para luchar contra el Estado y el Capitalismo.

Secretaría de Iniciativa Anarcosindicalista Sección de la Asociación Internacional de Trabajadores. AIT-IWA

Fuente: http://elmilicianocnt-aitchiclana.blogspot.no/2016/08/continua-la-persec...

Idioma:  Tipo de contenido: 
Categorías: A.I.T.

Victory of Priama akcia union in a wage theft conflict with CATO Agency

29 Xuño, 2016 - 19:30

In the first half of May 2016 Priama akcia entered a wage theft conflict against CATO Agency after we had been contacted by Martin asking for help with his unpaid wages. It took less than a month of activities and here is the good news – the company paid up. Our protest and direct action tactics proved effective once again. We would like to thank to everyone who spread information about the conflict and showed support to Martin.

REASON OF THE CONFLICT - UNPAID WAGES

Martin worked for CATO Agency as an unloader of animal food for Royal Canin between July 2015 and March 2016. Since November 2015, he also worked as a products promoter. Most of his wages came late which was in contradiction with the contract and § 129 of the Labour Code. In March 2016, he decided that he wouldn’t tolerate such business practices anymore and contacted Priama akcia union.

Since the money wasn’t paid up by the company director Veronika Šmihuľová Kašpar by the end of April (and she was claiming without providing any evidence that he had allegedly caused some damage) we decided to act.

OUR ACTIONS

On 1st May, we visited the headquarters of the company in Košice, which is at the same time a home address of the company managing directors. No-one opened the door, but we left a demand letter in the mailbox.

CATO Agency was given 7 days to pay up. They didn’t meet the deadline, so on Friday 13th May, we published an article announcing that we are entering a conflict with CATO Agency to make them pay the unlawfully withheld wage. Almost immediately a lawyer and the company director Šmihuľová Kašpar called Martin. They exchanged information about hours worked, which confirmed that CATO Agency owed Martin 190 €. The boss claimed that she had paid everything, but this was not true.

As the money wasn’t paid, on 24th May we published a template of a protest e-mail and an e-form that people could use to tell the company what they think about their practices. First, e-mails were sent mostly by people in Slovakia, but then the conflict took on an international dimension and information appeared in Slovak and English on various websites and Facebook.

Šmihuľová Kašpar was also responsible for PR and marketing of the international film festival Art Film Fest in Košice, so we contacted the organizers of the festival one after another and asked them for a statement regarding their cooperation with a person that runs business in Slovakia in such a way.

Soon after, we reminded in Košice again them that we are still here. On 1st June, there was a fashion show promoting new Art Film Fest costumes. The guests, media and festival partners received information about the practices of the managing director in front of the hotel in which this event took place.

AND MONEY WAS PAID

We didn’t have to carry on with our next planned activities. One week after the last action, Martin received 175 €. He considered the payment of this amount satisfactory and decided the campaign could end.

However, regardless of whether CATO Agency would have paid the remaining 15 € or not, we decided to inform them that this amount is still missing. We knew that the boss didn’t want to pay Martin for one taxi ride (5 €) although she had promised to pay, as well as for two hours (10 €) worked at a promo event for Royal Canin (the request to stay for two more hours had come from the representative of that company). We sent the boss an e-mail in which we described these sums and were curious how she would respond.

The next day a response came, in which, however, there was an unclear answer, so we sent a reminder a couple of days later. Only then did the company director make herself clear. She informed Martin that she required the actual taxi receipt (a scan was not enough) and that the remaining two hours simply would not be paid because the employer never demanded anything like this from him. (It would be quite interesting to see the accounting between CATO Agency and Royal Canin and how these two hours were recognised…)

CATO AGENCY PRACTICES

During the conflict we found several irregularities on the side of CATO Agency. However, we know only about one worker who worked for this company, and therefore can’t generalize. However, we think that potential CATO Agency workers should pay attention to the following:

  • Late wage payments. Money was paid after the period specified in § 129 of the Labour Code.
  • Non-payment of wages. This was the root cause of the conflict. The managing director lied when she claimed that she had paid everything. We believe that Martin was able to get his wages only thanks to the involvement of Priama akcia union and supporters.
  • Evidence of worked hours. It turned out that it was difficult for CATO Agency to provide complete evidence. On the contrary, Martin was able to recreate a precise work schedule for each month thanks to e-mail and SMS communication with the boss. Thus, he could easily dispute the evidence provided by her. However, he didn’t know that the two extra hours at a promo event, which were not confirmed, would become such a big deal.
  • A contract not in line with legal requirements. Neither the scope, nor the place of employment was duly specified in the student work contract
  • Is CATO Agency a temporary work agency? The company has the word “agency” in its name but according to the Business Register, there is nothing in its scope of business which would authorize it to act as an agent providing workers to other companies. Despite this, Martin worked for another company (Royal Canin) at the premises of a third company (building and gardening material stores) and followed not only the instructions of the managing director of CATO Agency, but also of the Royal Canin representative.

In connection with this case, we recommend being careful in the summer season when signing temporary contracts and working for different companies. As for student contracts in general, we dealt with them in a special publication Ideš na brigádu? Skúsenosti a tipy, ako so sebou nenechať zametať (in Slovak http://www.priamaakcia.sk/Ides-na-brigadu-Skusenosti-a-tipy-ako-so-sebou-nenechat-zametat----brozura.html) where we provided reports from discontented workers and tips on what to do in case of problems.

MARTIN’S POINT OF VIEW

When we met Martin he didn’t have a clear idea about what a potential conflict would require. We gave him all the information about Priama akcia union and explained that if he was willing to enter a conflict and be active, he would have our support. Also, we shared our experience from another conflict which was won in January 2016.

It was interesting to see how similarly bosses behave towards workers not only when they are not willing to pay but also in situations when they find themselves in conflict with our union (the most common reactions include denial, sidetracking and, of course, intimidation). We utilized the experience not only to prepare a strategy, but also to provide support in uncomfortable moments. On the other hand, we have to say that Martin stood his ground and was able to respond to unforeseen situations very well. Our tactics proved successful once again. Yet, we were curious how Martin viewed this case, so we asked him a few questions.

  • What did this conflict teach you? What experiences will you take into your further life?

It convinced me about the strength of direct action as a form of struggle. In my case I got the wages paid but I think I could generalize and say that various social problems can be solved by similar forms of pressure. I can’t imagine that I would have succeeded in the conflict so quickly, or at all, without Priama akcia. Also, the conflict helped me to learn how to handle different situations without being nervous. After all, I didn’t have any such experience before.

  • What was the most important thing in the conflict for you?

It was the support from people. I knew I wasn’t alone in it. When we were in Košice handing over the letter with the demand to pay the wages, I didn’t expect that there would be so many people willing to selflessly support me. Also, I felt support from friends and the people I know, but that was more or less moral support.

  • What advice would you offer to someone with a similar problem?

I would advise all the people with such a problem to not be afraid. I realize that sometimes it is easier to turn a blind eye to injustice, even when it affects you personally. I know that people in general are afraid of standing up to those who in a superior position. It took some time to decide if it was worthwhile for me to start an open conflict, but the support that I felt throughout the whole conflict and the successful result convinced me that I made the right decision.

THANK YOU!

Activists in Košice were very helpful in this conflict and played a key part, because they were involved in two very important direct actions (handing over the demand letter and the protest in front of the hotel). We had a positive response from Eastern Slovakia in general also in the form of protest e-mails and regardless of town, region or country we would like to thank everyone who found the time to send e-mail. It is an important and at the same time the easiest part of every conflict and, most probably, we will need such support in the future.

In this conflict we could once again rely on individuals and organizations from abroad, mostly (but not only) from the International Workers’ Association (IWA/AIT) – ZSP (Poland), NSF (Norway), KRAS (Russia), ASF (Australia), SP (Portugal), SF (UK), Solis (Czech), FAU (Germany), WSA (USA), AW (UK), plus other people from the UK, USA and Spain.

Thank you!

Worker’s solidarity union Priama akcia
Slovak section of the International Workers Association (IWA/AIT)

Idioma:  Seccion:  Tipo de contenido: 
Categorías: A.I.T.